Me, Myself, Katie, Katelyn and John

lmliberty:

Ya gotta love it! ABC and the other Democrat shill media tried their best to derail Newt’s campaign, particularly with women. Kinda looks like it backfired, eh?

Looks like the media is becoming irrelevant to an extent. That’s a good thing.

What do South Carolina’s Republican primary voters, who…

lmliberty:

That’s right kids! Members of congress were paid to vote for internet censorship, diminishing your free speech rights. Talk about whores prostituting themselves for the almighty dollar, and in return they take your speech rights. This, my misguided friends is the true definition of greed.

Oh,…

lmliberty:

Is anyone surprised? I told you a long time ago Obama & Company are going to cheat to win. They have to. What’s he going to do? Run on his record?

Nobody in their right mind would vote for this guy again. What? So we can have more, or worse of the same? He’s so bad he makes Jimmy Carter look…

libertariancontrarian:

Do you do business with any of these vampires? If you do, you are a part of the problem.

Every word is like an unnecessary stain on silence and nothingness.
Samuel Beckett (via eternelle-ritournelle)
evilteabagger:

“The Hoover-Roosevelt-Bush-Obama do-something-anything-everything approach to economic recovery seems to result in elongated depressions. In the Washington Post, James Grant says we should try the Harding approach instead.” — David Boaz

And how did the administration of Warren G. Harding, in conjunction with the Federal Reserve, produce these astonishing results? Why, by raising interest rates, reducing the public debt and balancing the federal budget.

evilteabagger:

“The Hoover-Roosevelt-Bush-Obama do-something-anything-everything approach to economic recovery seems to result in elongated depressions. In the Washington Post, James Grant says we should try the Harding approach instead.” — David Boaz

And how did the administration of Warren G. Harding, in conjunction with the Federal Reserve, produce these astonishing results? Why, by raising interest rates, reducing the public debt and balancing the federal budget.

So let me get this straight…

communismkills:

Liberals don’t want the 1% to have too much power.

There are approximately 307,006,550 people in America as of 2009.

So…

The liberals don’t want to 3,070,065 people to control the world, they’d much rather have 563 people, the American government, control the world.

Yep, that’s not minority tyranny or anything.

lmliberty:

Here are some of the things to learn from South Carolina.

Evangelicals went overwhelmingly for a twice divorced Catholic in the same percentage that they voted for a Baptist ordained minister in 2008. They haven’t warmed to Mitt Romney and if they haven’t warmed to him after 6 years of a…